Sunday, June 23, 2013

Chowdhury and Crabtree play with mitochondria

I still have a stack of comments needing a reply and a number of emails outstanding. Some awaaaaaay outstanding. Mea culpa, that's life. But this post has being lying around for so long that if I wait until all is tidy before I hit post it may never get posted at all, so here it is...



I have been reading a great number of Chowdhury's publications on diabetic neuropathy recently. I rather like his ideas and, although he limits his thinking to the NAD+/NADH ratio, his line of thought fits very well with the Protons thread and the FADH2/NADH ratio concept, which obviously influences NAD+/NADH. There is quite a lot of overlap and repetition within the recent papers as primary publications tend to blend with reviews. But a picture emerges about chronic hyperglycaemia and, very interestingly, of the problems from pathological relative or absolute hypoinsulinaemia.

In this paper [Aside: Note the association of DECREASED superoxide production with diabetes in the abstract, I rather like superoxide!] he mentions the Crabtree Effect. This is the fully reversible switch from a mixture of glycolysis and oxidative phosphorylation to almost pure glycolysis, classically seen in yeasts for alcohol production, when glucose supply is copious. Of course yeasts are fully able to dump their mitochondria completely, given enough sugar. A bit like certain types of cancer cells. Any cancer or yeast cell without mitochondria is utterly dependent on glycolysis for ATP production. These are the cancers which might well respond reliably to a ketogenic diet.

This is rather important as it explains why some cancer cells, which retain mitochondria but which show the Warburg effect in DMEM at 25mmol of glucose, might simply revert to oxidative phosphorylation on glucose restriction assuming FFAs or ketones are available. A nice Warburg/Crabtree paper is here and, while I've only had time to skim read it, it looks good. But I digress, back to Chowdhury:

He is primarily looking at neural failure in diabetes, from the bioenergetic and mitochondrial point of view. SIRT1, AMP kinase and good old PGC-1alpha are his areas of interest. This is from that first link:

"However, in the longer term, the high intracellular glucose concentration provides an ample supply of ATP via several nonmitochondrial-dependent pathways. Consequently, the metabolic phenotype of the cell adapts and functions in the absence of a dependence on the tricarboxylic acid cycle and oxidative phosphorylation for ATP production, possibly by initiating a process homologous to the “Crabtree effect” (35). Thus, rates of electron donation to the respiratory chain are suboptimal in neurons in long-term diabetic rats and may predispose to lower rates of mitochondrial respiratory chain activity and oxidative phosphorylation. Key metabolic activity sensors and/or regulators such as AMPK and NRF-1 are putative candidates for this modulation..."

and

"...our preliminary data demonstrated a significant reduction in activity of AMP kinase, a regulator of PGC1-α, in DRG [Dorsal Root Ganglia, cell bodies of sensory neurons] in type 1 diabetic rodents (manuscript in preparation)."


There is a nice summary of the metabolic sensors likely to be involved in his paper here. SIRT1 senses the NAD+/NADH ratio. Hyperglycaemia, in excess of insulin supply, depletes NAD+, increases NADH and, as a result, SIRT1 says to PGC-1alpha "Hey, no need for mitochonrdia, shut down mitochondrial biogenesis". Let's not forget nicotinic acid, NAD+, Hoffer and cancer. You could argue that nicotinic acid, by increasing NAD+, is an indirect activator of SIRT1... Of course SIRT1 controls a whole barrel of genes of great importance to health. I think FOXO has had many honourable mentions in comments by George. Also, no one should read SIRT1 without thinking of Cynthia Kenyon and her nematodes.

Chowdhury continues with AMP kinase, which can be viewed as a sensor looking at the ATP status of a cell, much as SIRT1 looks at the NADH status. If glycolysis is in overdrive there will be depleted AMP (also ADP and inorganic phosphate) as ADP gets converted by substrate level phosphorylation to ATP and needs replacing. The complexities of AMP, inorganic phosphate, ADP and ATP seem to be addresses in the Crabtree effect paper. If anyone wants to go there before me, feel free. But the simplistic picture is that excess ATP will act in a similar manner to excess NADH and both sensors interact with PGC-1alpha to say goodbye to mitochondrial biogenesis.

Dumping your mitochondria seems to be fine so long as you have continuous access to hyperglycaemic levels of glucose and can run on glycolysis. OK, I'll rephrase that: Dumping your mitochondria is an utter total complete disaster which is survivable, at a cost, so long as glucose is available in excess. Hyperglycaemia makes you hyperglycaemia dependent. If you really are running your nerve cells (and the rest of your body) on hyperglycaemia facilitated glycolysis then there appear to be a few follow on speculations available:

You get hungry if you lose your hyperglycaemia. I can remember being desperately hungry, in pre LC days, and being disappointed to see a blood glucose of 4.7mmol/l on the hand held glucometer at work. Hardly a low enough level to explain the driving hunger which I used to feel so commonly in those days...

Acute normalisation of glucose levels is going to make you feel utterly CRAP. This takes me back to the concept of "Atkins Flu" and J Stanton's musing as to its origin. The Crabtree effect is whole body, not limited to neurons. A dependence on hyperglycaemic glycolysis makes sudden onset normoglycaemia quite a shock. It's correctable, more rapidly in some people than others.

Then there is the phenomenon of initial worsening of retinopathy with acute onset normoglycaemia for diabetics. This has been noted in a couple of trials (link stolen from Jenny Ruhl). It's particularly worrying because it shows up in conventional "intensive therapy" for diabetes control, which is actually pretty poor in terms normalising blood glucose levels. So the risks are quite low compared to something like Bernstein's target of 4 or 5 mmol/l for blood glucose, 24-7, using an adequate protein, high fat, mildly ketogenic LC diet. For diabetes treatment you need something like this level of control for long term health. In the short term you seem to have to pay some sort of price to get yourself out of the hyperglycaemic corner you are stuck in. It looks like the Crabtree-like effect to me. Of course these short term problems pale compared to the long term benefits of normoglycaemia. But they are there.

Interestingly insulin, even without normoglycaemia, has some ameliorating effect on mitochondrial dysfunction in Chowdhury's lab models of diabetes. We might need to go back to Veech's early work on ketones vs glucose/insulin to take this further. This brings home nicely that diabetes, with relative or absolute hypoinsulinaemia is significantly worse than the earlier stage of impaired glucose tolerance, where hyperinsulinaemia still predominates.

So Chowdhury's ideas give some nice pointers as to why chronic hyperglycaemia is so bad. In his lab animals he is mostly looking at 22 weeks of streptozotocin diabetes to get the mitochondrial pathology, you can't pick up the changes to p<0.05 at 16 weeks. So we really are looking at long term neural damage in his papers.

Whatever the effects of acute hyperglycaemia, chronic hyperglycaemia does your mitochondria no good at all.

I rather like my mitochondria...

Peter

16 comments:

George Henderson said...

You might like this paper:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2651433/
The Importance of NAD in Multiple Sclerosis

in which the role of SIRTs as NAD sinks is dicussed.
"While IDO activation may keep auto-reactive T cells in check, hyper-activation of IDO can leave neuronal CNS cells starving for extracellular sources of NAD. Existing data indicate that glia may serve critical functions as an essential supplier of NAD to neurons during times of stress. Administration of pharmacological doses of non-tryptophan NAD precursors ameliorates pathogenesis in animal models of MS."

There is another aspect to Warburg or hyperglycemia; healthy cells may find OXPHOS inhibited, either by direct intervention from toxins produced by cancer cells (reverse Warburg) or pathogens, or by the hyperglycemic tide. And this can result in ATP becoming depleted in high-energy tissues, resulting for example in liver failure.
So ketogenic diets are not just about starving cancers, but also feeding healthy cells as efficiently as possible.

http://www.nutritionj.com/content/pdf/1475-2891-12-79.pdf

The last 2 paragraphs of the discussion containing most of the substance.
"An appropriate amount of fat intake may have the potential to improve PEM
and MHE under the condition such as cirrhosis, in which sugar and protein metabolisms
cannot work properly [47,48]."
Because the Complex I is unable to handle so much NADH, and the FADH2 is easier to covert to ATP??

Chip Spitter said...

https://medium.com/editors-picks/adfa0d026a7e

Sorry, not really related to this post-it's an article I just found on cognitive dissonance that could easily be applied to the field of nutrition. As to which 'side' has the greatest tendency toward motivated reasoning, argue away.

I don't really understand all the republican/democrat references because I intentionally remain ignorant on all things politics.

George Henderson said...

Which is why I prefer either experts who have changed their views at some stage and will tell you why, which is a common enough back story in paleo-low-carb land (ex-vegans and the like), or people who have always been so cautious that their views have seldom needed changing because they've never been foolish to begin with.
When it comes to climate change I have no reason to doubt the climatologists, and anyone but another climatologist makes a fool of themselves doing so. Whereas with diet, we can test most things for ourselves.

George Henderson said...

Some interesting stuff I learned about hepatic DNL that ties in with the protons thread:
Palmitate alone cannot be made into TGs. (palmitate NEFAs are PPAR-alpha ligands, stimulating hepatic B-oxidation at low glucose-insulin concentrations). So 2-carbon from glucose is used to extend palmitate to oleate.
Fatty livers tend to accumulate oleate - the TG synthesis via DNL elongation is upregulated but export is failing (e.g. choline deficiency). In NAFLD, carb conversion to DNL can be increased 5-fold. But much of this is elongation of dietary or NEFA palmitate to oleate.

Evangelista Nick said...

Whoa, very interesting! Thanks for sharing these.

Bill said...

Great post, Peter.
If only Warburg, Crabtree, & Philip Randle would've collaborated on a nutrition textbook... (Watford & Krebs, too). Metabolism proper is a fickle beast.

blogblog said...

What happens at the molecular levels isn't really useful in determining what a species should eat.

Virtually all wild mammals derive ~80% of their energy from fat. However the natural diet of mammals can be anything from a very high carbohydrate sugar based diet (fruit bats) to mostly fat (polar bears). What is important is how the raw nutrients are converted to fat and energy for use at the cellular level.

The Kitivans eat a 90% carbohydrate diet without a problem. They simply eat one large meal a day. Their bodies and gut microbiota convert most of the starches and sugars to fat and protein.

You can still 'low carb' by eating just one (high carbohydrate) meal a day and using fat stores to provide most of your energy.

George Henderson said...

Blogblog, if the Kitavan diet is 90% carbohydrate, why is it considered a diet high in saturated fat?
76-80% of Kitavans smoked, so should we all start smoking?
You would probably need a fecal transplant from a Kitavan and a lifetime supply of whatever they smoke to even begin to enjoy their diet.

Gabriella Kadar said...

So what you are saying is when we interview potential new hires, we need to ask about their diets. Or we'll end up with type 2 diabetic mitochondrial cripples.

Galina L. said...

Many people don't live alone, and in order to live Kitivan's life-style, you will have to live with that tribe or live alone. It is possible to have a single meal a day while the rest of family members eat more often, but not really convenient or practical. As all of us found out,a diet works while you follow it, so it is better to find something working and convenient at the same time. Family members sometimes have to adjust two, my husband and mom now eat only two times a day .

George Henderson said...

I wonder if Kitava does deliveries.
I mean, you couldn't go Kitavan on potatoes and bread, you'd have to rustle up the real Kitavan grub, whatever that is, probably includes grubs, taro, various roots and shoots.
This place I live in is pretty multicultural, I'll look out for a Kitavan supermarket here, let you know how the prices are.

Blogblog, how we have missed you.

George Henderson said...

I looked up PGC-1a
the first 3 activators (of 6) are very interesting:
PGC-1α is thought to be a master integrator of external signals. It is known to be activated by a host of factors, including:
1) Reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reactive nitrogen species (RNS), both formed endogenously in the cell as by-products of metabolism but upregulated during times of cellular stress.
2) It is strongly induced by cold exposure, linking this environmental stimulus to adaptive thermogenesis.[6]
3) It is induced by endurance exercise[4] and recent research has shown that PGC-1α determines lactate metabolism, thus preventing high lactate levels in endurance athletes and making lactate as an energy source more efficient.[7]

Ergo, hyperglycaemia effects may be aggravated (or at least not ameliorated) by antioxidants, central heating, and inactivity.

Unknown said...

I eagerly await the day when we can buy especially beneficial poo on Amazon.

Sadly, the drug companies will patent it first. They'll sell it to us for $50k/turd, trade name Upyorza.

Taryl said...

Unknown - LOL!

twitchyfirefly said...

Re cancers and glycolysis: http://www.aicr.org/cancer-research-update/july_07_2013/CRU_timothy_gershon_medulloblastoma.html

George Henderson said...

Or, maybe, all you needed was an aspirin:
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003986196900132

Thyromimetic Action of the Peroxisome Proliferators Clofibrate, Perfluorooctanoic Acid, and Acetylsalicylic Acid Includes Changes in mRNA Levels for Certain Genes Involved in Mitochondrial Biogenesis